| |
<< GO
BACK
|
LAWS PROTECTING WHISTLE-BLOWERS
FEDERAL LAWS:
There is no comprehensive federal law that prohibits
employers from retaliating against employees who disclose potential corporate
or governmental
violations of law. Hence, one must look at a the particular situation
and a plethora of federal laws to determine if one or more of the laws
will provide protection to an employee in any given situation. Some of
the provisions, which cover many areas in the environmental protection
arena, include the following:
Toxic Substances Control Act -- Title 15,
United States Code, Section 2622
The Superfund -- Title 42, United States
Code, Section, 9610
Water Pollution Control Act -- Title 33, United
States Code, Section 1367
Solid Waste Disposal Act – Title 42,
United States Code, Section 6971
Clean Air Act – Title 42, United
States Code, Section 7622
Atomic Energy and Energy Reorganization Acts – Title
42, United States Code, Section 5851
Safe Drinking Water Act -- Title
42, United States Code, Section 300j-9
The above seven laws are substantially
identical and provide for an administrative investigation and hearing
within the U. S. Department
of Labor. Relief includes reinstatement, back pay, compensatory damages,
and attorney’s fees. All of the laws require that a complaint be
file with the U. S. Department of Labor (primarily OSHA) within thirty
(30) days of the alleged discriminatory reprisal. For more information,
go to www.dol.gov/dol/asp/public/programs/handbook/whistle.htm
The newest
federal protection was created in 1986 with amendments to the False Claim
Act – Title 31, United States Code, Section 3729.
The act provides for civil liability against persons or corporations
who defraud the government. The whistle-blower protection provision is
extremely liberal and protects an employee who is discharged or discriminated
against on the basis of assisting in the preparation of litigation or
in filing a False Claims Act lawsuit.
The Surface Transportation Assistance
Act – Title 49, United
States Code, Section 2305 (Appendix 13) -- protects employee whistle-blowers
who file a complaint, testify in or bring about legal proceedings to
enforce a commercial motor vehicle safety, rule, regulation, or standard.
The
Occupational Safety and Health Act ("OSHA") – Title
29, United States Code, Section 669c -- protects employees from any form
of retaliation for raising complaints concerning workplace health and
safety that are enforced by OSHA.
The Federal Mine Health and Safety
Act – Title 30, United States
Code, Section 815c -- provides employment protection for any miner, miner’s
representative, or applicant for employment in a mine, who files or makes
a complaint regarding a potential violation of the law.
The National Labor
Relations Act – Title 30, United States Code,
Section 158(a)(4) and Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, Section
102.10 – protects employees from retaliation for having testified
or filed charges in a NLRB proceeding.
There are other federal statutes
protecting employees from exercising their rights under the law and
for participating in judicial and administrative
proceedings. These laws are too numerous to discuss here. If you believe
that you have been retaliated against for having complied with the
law or for having refused to disobey the law or for having testified
truthfully
in a proceeding, etc., you should consult an attorney to fully explore
your rights.
Go to www.osha.gov for more information. Many of the
Whistle-blower laws enforced by OSHA require a claim of retaliation to
be filed WITHIN
30 DAYS!
FLORIDA LAWS:
There are two main laws protecting employee "whistle-blowers" in
Florida. The purpose of both laws is to protect employees from retaliatory
personnel action against them because of their compliance with laws and
regulations and / or because they refused to participate in illegal conduct,
or because they reported illegal conduct or non-compliance.
The Florida
Private Whistle-blowers Act is found at Florida Statutes, Section 448.100
and following. Section 448.102 declares that an employer
(defined as any private individual, firm, partnership, institution,
corporation, or association that employs ten or more persons) may not
take any retaliatory
personnel action against an employee because the employee has:
Disclosed
, or threatened to disclose, to any appropriate governmental agency,
under oath, in writing, an activity, policy, or practice of the
employer that is in violation of a law, rule, or regulation. However,
this subsection does not apply unless the employee has, in writing,
brought the activity, policy, or practice to the attention of a supervisor
or
the employer and has afforded the employer a reasonable opportunity
to correct the activity, policy, or practice, provided information to,
or testified before, any appropriate governmental agency, person, or
entity conducting an investigation, hearing, or
inquiry into an alleged violation of a law rule, or regulation by
the employer,
OR
Objected to, or refused to participate in, any activity,
policy , or practice of the employer which is in violation of a law,
rule,
or regulation.
An employee who has been the object of a retaliatory
personnel action in violation of the above law may file a lawsuit in
the
appropriate
court within two years
after discovering that the alleged retaliatory personnel action was
taken, or within 4 years after the personnel action was taken, whichever
is
earlier.
The Florida Whistle-blower Act of 1986 [Florida Statutes,
Sections 112.3187 and following] has the purpose of protecting virtually
all public
employees, and employees of independent contractors who have contracts
with governmental agencies, who are fired or otherwise punished for reporting
certain specified activities or refusing to participate in such activities
(usually illegal activity or actions not in compliance with laws, rules
or regulations). Before an employee can file a lawsuit under this law,
he or she must first exhaust all available contractual and administrative
remedies, and then, if unsatisfied, file a lawsuit within 180 days of
the final administrative determination or the employers’ alleged
violation of the act, whichever is later.
|
|